设为首页
加入收藏
联系我们
Email-Alert
 

    首页 | 杂志介绍 | 编委成员 | 投稿指南 | 订阅指南 | 过刊浏览 | 临床研究、基础研究模板 | 专家共识、综述模板 | 出版伦理声明 | 帮助

 
杨志摩,杨浩伦,姜俊良,薛建良,杨 霖.远程综合运动治疗对非特异性颈痛患者疼痛和功能的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2025,(3):389~396
远程综合运动治疗对非特异性颈痛患者疼痛和功能的影响    点此下载全文
杨志摩  杨浩伦  姜俊良  薛建良  杨 霖
四川大学华西医院康复医学中心, 四川省成都市,610041
基金项目:四川省科技计划项目(2019YJ0130)
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2025.03.011
摘要点击次数: 725
全文下载次数: 223
摘要:
      摘要 目的:探究通过微信小程序提供的远程运动康复与传统的门诊-居家结合运动康复对非特异性颈痛参与者疼痛和功能的影响。 方法:将2021年1月至8月在四川大学华西医院康复医学中心就诊的66例对研究感兴趣的非特异性颈痛参与者随机分为门诊-居家联合康复组(对照组)和基于微信小程序的远程康复组(远程组)。两组参与者均采用统一的颈腰综合运动治疗进行干预,干预持续4周。在基线以及初次干预后4周和8周评估颈椎功能(颈部残疾指数)、疼痛强度(数字疼痛评定量表)和疼痛相关自我效能(疼痛自我效能问卷)。 结果:共有60例参与者完成了整个治疗和评估,远程组30例,对照组30例,两组之间人口统计学信息无显著性差异。在第4周时,两组的NDI,NPRS,PSEQ相较于基线都有改善且差异有显著性意义,但是组间差异没有显著性意义。在第8周时,远程组的以上三个指标相较于第4周都有明显改善,且远程康复组的NDI和NPRS结果优于对照组。 结论:远程运动康复和门诊-居家结合运动康复对非特异性颈痛均显示出积极的短期疗效,但远程康复显示出更持久的疗效,值得在临床上进一步尝试。
关键词:非特异性颈痛  远程康复  运动治疗  居家运动治疗
The effects of tele-rehabilitation with a comprehensive exercise program on pain and function in patients with non-specific neck pain    Download Fulltext
West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, 610041
Fund Project:
Abstract:
      Abstract Objective: To compare the effects of tele-rehabilitation delivered via a WeChat mini-program with traditional outpatient-home combined rehabilitation for non-specific neck pain patients. Method: Individuals with non-specific neck pain were recruited from the Rehabilitation Medicine Department of West China Hospital between January 2021 and August 2021, were randomly assigned to either tele-rehabilitation treatment group (TRG) or outpatient-home combined rehabilitation group. Both groups received comprehensive exercise therapy at home or in the clinic for 4 weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks post-intervention, using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). Result: A total of 60 patients completed the intervention, with 30 in each group. There were no significant demographic differences between groups. At the 4-week mark, both groups showed significant improvements in NDI, NPRS and PSEQ scores compared to baseline, but no significant differences were found between groups. By the 8th week, the tele-rehabilitation group showed further improvements in all three metrics, with NDI and NPRS scores significantly better than those of the outpatient-home combined rehabilitation group. Conclusion: Both remote and outpatient-home combined comprehensive exercise therapies demonstrate short-term effects on non-specific neck pain. However, tele-rehabilitation exhibited more sustained improvements, suggesting that it holds promise for further clinical application.
Keywords:non-specific neck pain  tele-rehabilitation  exercise therapy  home-based exercise
查看全文  查看/发表评论

您是本站第 50925319 位访问者

版权所有:中国康复医学会
主管单位:中国科学技术协会 主办单位:中国康复医学会
地址:北京市朝阳区樱花园东街,中日友好医院内   邮政编码:100029   电话:010-64218095   

本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计
京ICP备18060696号-2

京公网安备 11010502038612号