| 马文静,刘保兴,郭建强,黄浩男,刘 畅,江 山,葛瑞东.发散式体外冲击波治疗勃起功能障碍的临床疗效观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,2025,(5):687~693 |
| 发散式体外冲击波治疗勃起功能障碍的临床疗效观察 点此下载全文 |
| 马文静 刘保兴 郭建强 黄浩男 刘 畅 江 山 葛瑞东 |
| 中日友好医院男科,北京市,100029 |
| 基金项目:中央高水平医院临床科研业务费资助项目(2023-NHLHCRF-YYPPLC-TJ-19,2022-NHLHCRF-PY-10) |
| DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2025.05.006 |
| 摘要点击次数: 678 |
| 全文下载次数: 273 |
| 摘要: |
| 摘要
目的:验证联合运用中低量级能量流动密度(energy flow density,EFD)的发散式体外冲击波疗法(radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy,rESWT)治疗勃起功能障碍(erectile dysfunction,ED)的临床疗效。
方法:36例ED患者随机分为两组,每组18例,一组为rESWT组,另一组为对照组(他达拉非组)。rESWT组接受16次rESWT,每周2次,疗程8周;对照组口服他达拉非片,每日1次,每次5mg,疗程8周。分别于治疗前、治疗1个月、治疗2个月、治疗结束后随访1个月、随访3个月、随访6个月评价患者的5项国际勃起功能指数(5-item international index of erectile function,IIEF-5)、勃起硬度评级(erection hardness score,EHS)。
结果:rESWT组与对照组IIEF-5、EHS各时间点整体比较均存在显著差异(P<0.001)。rESWT组IIEF-5:治疗1个月显著高于治疗前(P<0.001)、低于对照组(P<0.05);治疗2个月显著高于治疗1个月(P<0.001),与对照组未见差异(P>0.05);随访1个月、随访3个月较治疗2个月未见差异(P>0.05);随访3个月高于对照组(P<0.05);随访6个月高于治疗前(P<0.05)。对照组IIEF-5:治疗1个月较治疗2个月未见差异(P>0.05)且显著高于治疗前(P<0.001);随访1个月低于治疗2个月(P<0.01);随访3个月、随访6个月较治疗前未见差异(P>0.05)。rESWT组各时间点的EHS与对照组比较均未见差异(P>0.05),但rESWT组治疗2个月、随访1个月高于治疗前(P<0.05)。
结论:联合运用中低量级EFD的rESWT治疗ED可达到他达拉非的疗效,且在维持疗效及长效性方面优于他达拉非,具有一定的临床应用价值。 |
| 关键词:勃起功能障碍 冲击波 疗效观察 随机对照研究 |
| Clinical efficacy observation of radial extracorporeal shock wave in the treatment of erectile dysfunction Download Fulltext |
|
| China-Japan Friendship Hospital,Beijing,100029 |
| Fund Project: |
| Abstract: |
| Abstract
Objective: To verify the clinical efficacy of using radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) with a combination of low-to-moderate energy flow density (EFD) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).
Method: Thirty-six patients with ED were randomly divided into two groups, with 18 patients in each group. The rESWT group received 16 sessions of rESWT (twice weekly for 8 weeks), while the control group took oral tadalafil 5 mg once daily for 8 weeks. The 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and Erection Hardness Score (EHS) were evaluated before treatment, at 1 month and 2 months during treatment, and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the completion of treatment.
Result: The overall comparison of IIEF-5 and EHS scores between the rESWT group and the control group at various time points showed significant differences (P<0.001). For the rESWT group, the IIEF-5 score after 1 month of treatment was significantly higher than that before treatment (P<0.001) but lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). After 2 months, it was significantly higher than at 1 month (P<0.001) with no difference compared to the control group (P>0.05). There were no significant differences were observed at the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups compared to the 2-month treatment (P>0.05). At 3 months of follow-up, the score was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). At 6 months of follow-up, the score was higher than that before treatment (P<0.05). For the control group, the IIEF-5 score, there were no differences between 1 and 2 months of treatment (P>0.05), but both were significantly higher than before treatment(P<0.001). At 1 month of follow-up, the score was lower than at 2 months of treatment (P<0.01). There was no difference in EHS between the rESWT group and the control group (P>0.05), but the rESWT group was treated for 2 months and followed up for 1 month, which was higher than that before treatment (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The combined use of low-to-moderate EFD rESWT can achieve the same efficacy comparable to Tadalafil in ED treatment and demonstrates superior durability of response, indicating its broader clinical application. |
| Keywords:erectile dysfunction shock wave efficacy observation randomized controlled trial |
|
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 |